The AF-S NIKKOR 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR lens is one of the most popular lens choices among wildlife photographers due to its versatility and price. It offers a large zoom range, making it ideal for capturing everything from small birds to large mammals.

In this article, we will review the Nikon 200-500mm lens from the perspective of a wildlife photographer.

I bought my Nikon 200-500mm on Amazon in 2020 and have loved shooting with it for three years. It’s a wonderful lens for wildlife photography, especially if you’re a bird photographer.

In this Nikon 200-500 review, I will:

• Give an in-depth analysis of the pros and cons of the Nikon 200-500mm

• Share sample photos using the lens

• Compare it to other Nikon lenses for wildlife photography

• Reveal my wildlife photography settings for the Nikon D500

Most importantly, I will tell you why the Nikon 200-500 is still one of the best lenses for wildlife photography, especially for wildlife photographers on a budget!

Wildlife Photography Gear Reviews

If you are a wildlife photographer on a budget, you will not want to miss these articles where I provide in-depth reviews about some of the most affordable Nikon cameras and lenses on the market.

• Why the Nikon D500 is one of the BEST Cameras for Wildlife Photography in 2022 (Review)

• Wildlife Photography: Nikon Lenses on a Budget

• Why the Nikon 70-300mm is the best beginner lens for wildlife photography (Review)

• Why the Nikon 300mm f/4 AF-S is a bargain in 2021 (Review)

• Is the Nikon 300 PF the most portable lens for wildlife photography? (Review)

Overview of the Nikon 200-500

The Nikon 200-500mm is a zoom lens with a focal range from 200mm to 500mm, with a fixed f/5.6 aperture. This range is perfect for capturing shots of various animals, especially when paired with a DX camera. It is also reasonably compact and affordable, making it an excellent investment for wildlife photography enthusiasts.

Nikon 200-500mm Specifications

• Focal Length: 200-500mm

• Max Aperture: f/5.6

• Min Aperture: f/32

• Minimum Focus Distance: 2.2m / 7.2 ft.

• Magnification Ratio: 0.22x

• Weight: 2.3kg / 81.2 oz

• Vibration reduction (VR): up to 4.5 stops correction

Before diving into a list of pros and cons of this lens, I will first discuss three other areas that require a more detailed analysis:

• Autofocus

• Price

• Weight and ergonomics

Autofocus

As a wildlife photographer, one of the most critical technical aspects is an accurate, fast autofocus system.

Regarding accuracy, the Nikon 200-500mm locks onto subjects well. That said, its performance depends on your camera body and the lighting conditions. The autofocus system works very well when paired with class-leading DSLRs like the Nikon D500 or Nikon D850, especially with good lighting. The Nikon Z9 is currently the only Nikon mirrorless camera that performs similarly (actually better) in this area. 

Despite its accuracy, the Nikon 200-500mm autofocus speed is slower compared to similar lenses. While it's suitable for capturing subjects that aren't moving quickly, it may struggle with acquiring focus on fast-moving subjects, leading to missed moments you may have gotten with other lenses.

Additionally, the lens features a focus limiter switch, allowing faster and more accurate focusing within a specific range. To maximize the Nikon 200-500’s autofocus capabilities, I recommend limiting your minimum focusing distance and only switching back to the full range when your subject is close enough. This prevents your camera from cycling through its entire focusing range, saving precious milliseconds to increase your chances of getting the perfect shot.

Price

Price is always a top consideration as a wildlife photographer who’s always after the best budget gear. The Nikon 200-500 is reasonably priced compared to lenses with similar focal lengths. As of writing this blog post, this brand-new lens costs $1,399.95.

One of the best things about the Nikon 200-500 is that it provides the same reach as the top-level telephoto primes for a fraction of the price. This makes it an ideal option for wildlife photographers who want to capture stunning images without breaking the bank.

Two prime lenses with the same maximum 500mm focal length, the Nikon 500mm f/4E FL ED VR and Nikon 500 PF, cost $10,299.95 and $3,599.95, respectively. At a minimum, you’re paying nearly three times as much for the 500 PF and upwards of seven times more for the newest 500mm f/4.

Buying used is an excellent option to save money on the Nikon 200-500. While researching for this blog post, I found used options on Amazon for as low as $835, which is a great deal. This is a significant saving, and it is worth considering if you are on a budget.

If I were to buy this lens now, I would try to get the cheapest option possible and choose the platform I felt safest on. While you can score great deals from private sellers, you have a different level of security than a larger company, such as Amazon. That's exactly where I bought my version of this lens in 2020.

Weight and Ergonomics

At 5.07 pounds (2.3 kg), the Nikon 200-500mm is not the lightest telephoto lens on the market, but its weight is reasonable, given its capabilities. For those accustomed to shooting with prime lenses like the Nikon 300mm f/2.8, this lens will feel relatively light. However, if you're used to lenses such as the 70-300mm or the 300mm PF, the Nikon 200-500mm will undoubtedly feel heavier in comparison. Measuring 10.5 inches (267.5mm) long at 200mm and extending to 15.5 inches (393.7mm) at 500mm, the Nikon 200-500mm is relatively compact for its focal range.

One issue with the lens is that its weight is less well-distributed than other telephoto lenses since it is not concentrated close to the camera body end. Nevertheless, the lens boasts an exceptional five stops of VR, significantly improving its hand-holdability and making it easier to use in tight spaces and challenging terrains.

The build quality of the Nikon 200-500mm is impressive. The lens barrel is crafted from high-quality polycarbonate material, while the metal mount ensures a secure connection to the camera body. Weather-sealing protects the lens from dust and moisture, adding durability in various environmental conditions.

Pros

Zoom range and focal length

The Nikon 200-500’s zoom range provides flexibility to shoot several compositions. This proves especially useful in situations where movement is limited, such as when working from a hide or with subjects that are sensitive to movement.

One of the most significant advantages of using the Nikon 200-500mm lens on a crop sensor (DX) body like the Nikon D500 – Nikon's top crop sensor camera for wildlife photography – is its increased reach. Although I have used this lens with the Nikon D850 and D700, I've taken more than 95% of my photos with the Nikon D500.

On a crop sensor camera, you effectively boost your focal length from 200-500mm to 300-750mm, thanks to the 1.5x crop factor. This is highly beneficial for wildlife photography where you often want to fill more of the frame while remaining at a respectful distance from the animal.

What makes the Nikon 200-500mm even more appealing is that it delivers this extended reach at a fraction of the weight and cost of other super-telephoto lenses, like the Nikon 600mm f/4E FL ED VR (3810 g/8 lb 6.4 oz. and $13,000) or the Nikon 800mm f/5.6 ($16,299.95).

The versatility of the Nikon 200-500mm is impressive and makes it easier to photograph all types of subject.

Image quality

Lens sharpness is a crucial aspect of wildlife photography, often becoming the subject of passionate debates. My experience with the Nikon 200-500mm has been positive, especially considering its price.

Photography Life's assessment of the lens' sharpness is consistent with my observations: the Nikon 200-500mm performs admirably throughout its zoom range. At 200mm, the lens delivers impressive sharpness, which gradually decreases as you approach 500mm. Despite this slight degradation, the overall image quality remains more than satisfactory.

Note: While lens sharpness is important for wildlife photography, your technique often plays a more significant role in achieving sharp results. Whether you use a tripod or employ good hand-holding techniques can make a difference in your photographs, sometimes more so than the lens itself.

Read more: Here's Why Your Photos Aren't Sharp: 8 Tips to Improve Sharpness in Your Photography

Minimum focus distance

IThe lens's minimum focusing distance (MFD) is the shortest distance between the lens and an object at which it can achieve perfect focus. The Nikon 200-500's MFD distinguishes it from other 500mm wildlife photography lenses. At just 7.2 ft (2.2 m), it provides an unparalleled opportunity to capture stunning images of elusive wildlife up close and personal.

The Nikon 500mm f/4E FL ED VR has an MFD of 11.9 ft (3.6m), and the Nikon 500 PF lens stands at 3m (9.8ft). This difference tremendously impacts the versatility and usefulness of the Nikon 200-500 in the field if you can get very close to your subjects.

To put things into perspective, even the highly-regarded Nikon 300mm f/2.8 VR II, known for its impressive close-focusing capabilities, has a similar MFD of 2.3m (7.5 ft). However, the Nikon 200-500 outperforms it since it has a 200mm advantage. This allows you to fill the frame more with stunning detail.

The Nikon 200-500 can easily double as a semi-macro lens. The ability to focus closer enables you to capture more of your subject in the frame and reveal intricate details that other lenses may overlook. An example is my photo above of an American toad in a forest.

Vibration reduction

The Nikon 200-500mm is a game-changer due to its impressive VR performance.

It offers up to 4.5 stops of image stabilization, which is remarkable for shooting handheld at slow shutter speeds in low light. This was previously unthinkable without the use of a tripod. The Nikon 200-500’s VR compensates for the lack of a fast aperture. I can confidently capture usable wildlife images, even in less-than-ideal lighting conditions.

Comparing the Nikon 200-500 to other Nikon lenses I've used, I can confidently say this lens boasts the best image vibration reduction. The VR system transformed my ability to capture sharp images, making it an indispensable part of my photography gear. It's best to complement the Nikon 200-500mm image stabilization with a solid hand-holding technique, which is crucial to minimizing blurry images due to camera shake.

Weather sealing

My approach to wildlife photography often involves getting very muddy and wet (and uncomfortable) to get close to my subjects. Not all lenses are made for this task, but the Nikon 200-500mm holds up very well. It has proven to be a trusty companion, boasting weather sealing that impressed me for its relatively low price.

I've used this lens in various challenging environments, including heavy rain, muddy wetlands, dense forests, and even an accidental dip in the water. The lens held up wonderfully each time and performed at a high level. Its resilience in these situations showcases the durability and reliability that wildlife photographers need when shooting outdoors.

The Nikon 200-500 may not have the same level of weather sealing as pro-grade lenses, but my experience with it in harsh conditions has been very positive, especially paired with its protective LensCoat.

However, it's important to remember that proper care and maintenance are essential for any lens, mainly when used in adverse conditions. After each outing where the lens gets dirty, I thoroughly clean the front element, outer lens barrel, and mount. Doing so ensures the longevity and continued performance of your lens.

Cons

Lens hood

A lens hood provides essential protection for the front glass element of the lens, shielding it from minor bumps, tree twigs, and rain. However, the HB-71 lens hood included with the Nikon 200-500 has some drawbacks that may affect your shooting experience.

The most significant issue is that it falls off occasionally. This can be frustrating, especially during a fast-paced wildlife shoot where every moment counts. While this might not be a deal-breaker for some, it's worth considering when evaluating the overall user experience.

Should you use the Nikon 200-500 with teleconverters?

Although Nikon 200-500 can work with teleconverters to extend your focal length, I don’t usually recommend using them.

Aperture decreases, which is a drawback, but the main issue is the autofocus becomes inconsistent and more challenging to use on DSLRs. I imagine it wouldn’t be as problematic on the Z9 and its competent autofocus, but I haven’t tested it thus far.

Competitors

Since I started wildlife photography, I have used several lenses that I consider competitors of the Nikon 200-500 in terms of focal length, use, and price range.

Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 300mm f/4

Pros

Cheaper: The Nikon 300mm f/4 AF-S is less than half the price of a Nikon 200-500.

Sharper: As expected from a prime lens, Nikon 300mm f/4 AF-S is sharper than the Nikon 200-500. However, this advantage disappears when using a teleconverter on the Nikon 300mm f/4 AF-S.

Lighter: At only 1440 g (3.17 lbs), the Nikon 300mm f/4 AF-S is nearly half the weight of the Nikon 200-500, making it easier to carry for longer periods.

Faster autofocus: The Nikon 300mm f/4 AF-S has faster, snappier autofocus than the Nikon 200-500mm.

Wider aperture: As a fixed f/4 lens, the 300mm lets in 1 more stop (or double the amount) of light as the Nikon 200-500, helping to produce more pleasing out-of-focus backgrounds.

Cons

No image stabilization: Although lighter, you will get significantly fewer sharp shots due to the lack of image stabilization, especially at slower shutter speeds.

No zoom: The Nikon 200-500’s zoom range is hard to beat for various compositions. A prime lens like the Nikon 300mm f/4 AF-S cannot compete.

Less focal length: With this lens, you’re stuck at 300mm, whereas with the other, you can reach 500mm.

Read more: Wildlife Photography on a Budget: Why the Nikon 300mm f/4 AF-S is a bargain in 2023 (Review)

Nikon 300 PF

Pros

Compared to the Nikon 200-500, the Nikon 300 PF shares many advantages with its predecessor, the Nikon 300mm f/4 AF-S. It’s sharper, focuses faster, and has the same f/4 aperture. However, its main advantage over zoom is its weight. At just 755g, it’s more than three times lighter than the Nikon 200-500.

Cons

Like the Nikon 300mm f/4 AF-S, the 300 PF cannot zoom and has less focal length than the Nikon 200-500mm.

Price: As of writing this article, the 300 PF is $1,999.95 brand new from Nikon, which is $600 more than the Nikon 200-500. You will find it for at least $400 more on the used market than the zoom.

Read more: Is the Nikon 300 PF the most portable lens for wildlife photography? (Review)

Nikon 300mm f/2.8G VR II

Note: The Nikon 300mm f/2.8 VR is one of Nikon’s top lenses. As such, it is undoubtedly a class above the Nikon 200-500 in terms of sharpness and image quality, which is reflected in its price ($5,499.95 new). However, I wanted to provide you with my experience to give you some valuable information to best inform your personal use.

Pros

Aperture: With a maximum aperture of 2.8, the Nikon 300mm f/2.8 VR II lets in four times the light, allowing you to lower your ISO and produce more pleasing bokeh.

Autofocus: The AF speed and accuracy is much better than on the Nikon 200-500 and is the best from this brand I have used.

Sharpness: Often regarded as the standard for sharpness, this lens is the sharpest from Nikon I have ever used and beats out the Nikon 200-500.

Teleconverter compatibility: The Nikon 300mm f/2.8 VR II is made to be used with teleconverters and takes all three (1.4x, 1.7x, and 2x) incredibly well, producing usable images at all levels.

Cons

More expensive: Of all the competitors, the Nikon 300mm f/2.8 VR II is by far the most costly. You can find it brand new for $5,499.95, but used for around $4,500 or sometimes even cheaper.

Weight: The Nikon 300mm f/2.8 VR II weighs 2900 g (6.39 lbs), 600 g or more than a pound heavier than the Nikon 200-500. This makes it much harder to hold for more extended periods.

VR: Although the Nikon 300mm f/2.8 VR II has solid vibration reduction, the Nikon 200-500 handily beats it in this area.

NIKON AF-S VR 70-300 f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED

Pros

Price: This is by far the cheapest lens of the bunch. You can find it on Amazon for as little as $239.

Weight: Weighing in at 745 g (1.64 lb), the 70-300 is the lightest lens on this list, making it a practical alternative if you want a cheap, ultra-portable lens.

Cons

Sharpness: As a consumer-grade lens, the 70-300 is less sharp than the Nikon 200-500.

Build: The 70-300 is primarily plastic, compared to the metal mount and weather sealing of the Nikon 200-500. While this makes it more affordable, it is also less durable.

Focal length: Although 300mm is a viable option for wildlife photography, having more focal length is generally better for getting closer to your subjects. In this case, the increased range of the Nikon 200-500 wins out for most wildlife photographers.

Read more: Wildlife Photography on a Budget: Why the Nikon 70-300mm is the best beginner lens for wildlife photography (Review)

Third-party options from Sigma and Tamron

Historically, I have preferred to use native lenses with my camera bodies, so I haven’t had the chance to test any Sigma or Tamron telephotos that compete directly with the Nikon 200-500. 

However, there are several options within a similar price range for you to look at, some of which are cheaper than the Nikon 200-500:

• Sigma 150-600MM F5-6.3 DG OS HSM | C ($989)

• Tamron 150-600mm f/5-6.3 VC ($1,399)

• Sigma 150-600MM F5-6.3 DG DN OS | S ($1,499)

• Sigma 60-600MM F4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM | S ($1,999)

• Sigma 150-600MM F5-6.3 DG OS HSM | S ($1,999)

How to best use the Nikon 200-500

In this section, I will share my insights on how best to use the Nikon 200-500 for wildlife photography.

Pair it with a crop sensor camera

For many wildlife photographers, especially beginners, the Nikon 200-500 shines on a crop sensor camera, like the Nikon D500, which I have used for several years. The crop sensor effectively increases the lens's focal length, giving you more reach and allowing you to fill the frame with your subject better.

Avoid teleconverters and get closer to your subject

Although the Nikon 200-500 provides substantial reach, it's always better to try and get closer to your subject whenever possible. Relying on a teleconverter to increase the focal length can degrade image quality and reduce autofocus performance. By getting closer to your subject, you can maintain the optical quality of your images and capture more intimate and detailed shots that reveal the unique behaviors and characteristics of the wildlife you're photographing.

Be aware of its limitations, but don’t be afraid to experiment

Like any other lens, the Nikon 200-500 has limitations, such as its aperture or weight. However, don't let these limitations deter you from experimenting with different compositions, lighting scenarios, and more. For example, even if I generally do not recommend using the Nikon 200-500 with teleconverters, I have used them before successfully, and so have other people I know. Embrace the lens's strengths, such as its impressive sharpness and versatility, and push the boundaries of your creativity.

Bottom line

In conclusion, the Nikon 200-500 is an excellent lens for wildlife photography, versatile for capturing various wildlife images. In my time using it, its zoom range and focal length were game-changers for my photography, especially in a relatively light and affordable package compared to larger, more expensive lenses.

Once you learn how to overcome the limitations of its slow autofocus and its weight, you still have one of the best lenses for wildlife photography on a budget. As technology advances, this lens’ price will only decrease, making it an even more cost-effective deal than it is now.

If you use the Nikon 200-500, you have one of if not Nikon’s best lenses for wildlife photography at this price point. So, get out there and take some excellent animal pictures!

Where to buy

If you are interested in purchasing the Nikon 200-500mm, there are several cheap, used options on Amazon for around $1000. If you live in Canada, Kijiji is a great place to get even cheaper gear if you are willing to buy cameras and lenses without an intermediary service.